
Violence is one of the issues that have been on the agenda especially recently. Because of a very popular topic, I feel the need to question its reasons. Of course, most events that result in violence do not occur out of nowhere, they have a pattern of various causes. There are many methods of communication, and we use them to express our desires and needs. Of course, we need to communicate in order to achieve a violent outcome. Therefore, I think that all kinds of violence can be prevented by the interventions we will make in our communication style.
Why do we need violence first, maybe we need to think about it. Is violence inherent in humanity? The definition of naturalness is quite clear in the presentation made by Altuğ Coşkun. If we can question what exists and find the reason for it, what we question is actually not natural. In this sentence, I interpret the interpretation that naturalness is actually caused by instinctive situations that we question and cannot find an answer to. I think we can question the existence and cause of violence. Therefore, I think it is preventable.
As I mentioned before, maybe we can get rid of all forms of violence by improving the way we communicate and our methods. Non-Violent Communication basically advocates that communication is made in peace and quiet and seeks ways to do so.
We are all human beings, and we naturally have needs and desires to live. In fact, we realize the main reason of most communication we have established because we want to express these needs and desires and to be perceived by others. This situation can occur directly or indirectly. However, the difficulties that may arise in communication create thoughts in the people that these needs and desires cannot be met. These problems may be behaviors such as not listening to people, not being empathetic, respect and stance towards people, not focusing on shared issues. The reactions people give to these are shaped depending on the cultural and psychological environment in which they grew up.
Polarization is the main problem for the occurrence of violence in solving existing problems. Scientifically, determining right, wrong, right or wrong may seem to solve the existing problems, but it will lead to the emergence of brand new problems. As in justice, guilty and innocent should also be defended. They have thoughts, needs, and desires on both sides. If the solution is produced according to the right or wrong while reaching a compromise, it will always continue to do wrong, if the right is always right and wrong. Do you think this is the best way to solve problems?
As Mevlana said, “There is a garden beyond the right and the wrong. We should meet there. ” In other words, finding an ideal practical way to meet everyone’s needs, such as option C, instead of finding conflicting solutions such as option A and option B, will lead to healthy communication on behalf of everyone and will also be instrumental in solving the problems that may occur.




